🔗 Share this article

After the Chicago Sky drafted the celebrated LSU star using the No 7 overall pick last year, many believed she could be a turning point. Although claiming the championship in recent years, the Chicago team have been a losing team for many seasons. Reese brought not only celebrity but also dynamic play and superb rebounding.

Performance Excellence vs. Off-Court Tensions

On the court, Reese has exceeded the hype: having become a back-to-back All-Star and has led the league in rebounds in each of her first two WNBA seasons.

Yet within the team environment, conflicts have emerged. The Sky were eliminated in the opening stage of the playoffs last year. This time around, they ended up with the lowest record in the entire WNBA, alongside the Dallas Wings.

Public Criticism and Team Response

Reese was openly vocal about showing her feelings. She stated the team “need to get better players … must get elite players” and implying she’d seek a trade if improvements weren't made, she issued an apology. “It wasn't my intention to disrespect my teammates,” she explained.

Team management duly suspended her for one half for “comments harmful to the team.”

A Heavy-Handed Disciplinary Action

As someone with pro experience, calling out teammates is typically seen as a breach of etiquette. However, did penalizing her and a public statement the appropriate response? Many felt as though the Sky were attempting to embarrass their star.

She has been the subject of online abuse since joining the league, in part to her high-profile rivalry with another top rookie (a dynamic both players publicly minimized). By reprimanding her, the team paved the path for detractors to feast and slander her.

This action appeared petty, and soon had negative consequences. Sky fans flooded social media with support for their player. During the final home contest, banners appeared in the stands reading “Free Angel Reese”, while others called for the firing of general manager the front office leader.

Inconsistent Messaging

The suspension didn’t just seem heavy-handed, it was inconsistent with the rest of the league. Other WNBA stars have expressed concerns with their teams without facing punishment.

Pagliocca himself later repeated her comments about the necessity for improved roster construction – the exact issue that led to her penalty. This contradiction was unmistakable: when the player says it, it’s insubordination; when the general manager says it, it’s a strategy.

This dynamic is particularly troubling when you consider how frequently African American athletes like Reese are criticized for being assertive.

Historical Context

What makes this striking is that this conflict with the front office is only the most recent example in a much longer shambolic narrative for the Sky.

They are a team with a track record of running off talent. One legend, Elena Delle Donne, a hometown hero – each left Chicago frustrated. A recent addition came back this year only to find things aren’t much better.

A respected analyst noted, “You can list so many players that could be on the team right now but elected to leave the Chicago Sky due to their issues with the management.”

“Could you imagine a Chicago team with its core stars? That’s a championship caliber lineup. But they have a history of squandering away talent.”

Coaching Change

Dismissing head coach their recent coach only worsened matters. The athlete said the move left her “heartbroken” and stated that her coach was the only person who “had genuine faith in me” as a Black woman in sports.

One would struggle to imagine a more tone-deaf move if the aim is to keep your biggest star happy.

Poor Results

Maybe this would be more palatable if the Sky were in championship contention. But the last two seasons have been, bluntly, abysmal.

In 2024 they won 18 of their 30 games. In 2025, they won far fewer, finishing joint-last despite having two recently honored first-year players. The latest rookies – both highly skilled – have had challenging seasons.

Front Office Missteps

Even the draft has become a example of poor decision-making. This year, Chicago did not pick a rookie who blossomed into an All-Star on another team, instead dealing the pick – along with a valuable asset – for a veteran expected to depart soon.

The Sky sacrificed long-term prospects for little return, while their young stars labored through another losing season.

Future Uncertainty

No surprise that supporters are already debating where Reese might play next year. Pairing her with other young stars on other teams are dream scenarios, but the reality is simple: Reese has choices.

As a established star, still only at the beginning of her professional journey, and she deserves an team that values her with the respect she has rightfully gained.

When Reese chooses she’s had enough of the Chicago Sky, no one should be surprised. Responsibility won’t fall on her. It will be entirely on an franchise that seems determined on driving its top assets away.