🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have voted to pull out from an international accord created to safeguard females from violence, covering domestic abuse, following extensive and intense debates in the parliament.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in the capital this past week to oppose the decision. The ultimate decision now lies with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the legislation.

Referred to as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last year, mandating authorities to establish legal frameworks and assistance programs to eliminate all types of abuse.

Latvia has become the initial European Union member to initiate the procedure of exiting from the convention. The transcontinental nation pulled out in two years ago, a decision that human rights organizations described as a significant regression for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Resistance

The treaty was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet conservative groups have argued that its emphasis on gender equality undermines traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Latvian parliament, MPs voted 56 to 32 to withdraw from the convention, a move proposed by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister Evika Silina, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Political Divisions and Reactions

One of the main parties supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has called on citizens to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman Karina Palkova urged the treaty not to be made political, while the group the rights organization asserted it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The recent decision has sparked widespread outcry both within the country and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have endorsed a Latvian petition calling for the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has called a protest for next Thursday, charging lawmakers of disregarding the will of the nation's citizens.

Global Worries and Potential Next Steps

The leader of the European organization's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a hasty choice fueled by misinformation. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning regression for female equality and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He added that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the convention in 2021, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a supermajority majority, the head of state could possibly return the legislation for further consideration if he holds concerns.

President Rinkevics announced on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to legal principles, "considering governmental and judicial factors, rather than belief-based perspectives".

Last week, another member of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, indicated it would not rule out appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a worrisome development for women's rights not only in our nation but throughout the continent," stated a rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse rates have been increasing in several EU nations
• The European treaty requires particular legal protections for victims of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could influence comparable discussions in other EU countries